Showing posts with label class. Show all posts
Showing posts with label class. Show all posts

Saturday, April 20, 2013

10 Things to expect from College

I've posted a great amount of posts on all types of things to look forward to during college but this list might be the most important.

Some of the things on this list are inevitable while others are part of the culture of college.

Lets begin.

Top 10 things to expect from College


1.Skipping Class-  Everyone does it once in a while.  Not going to class has become part of the college experience.  I am not condoning skipping class but I guarantee that you will meet a friend that has something better to do rather than go to class.






2. Canceled Class-  This is probably every students favorite part of college, receiving an email that class was canceled.  I cannot explain to you how much joy I felt every time  I checked my email and saw that the professor had canceled class.





3.Parties- I can easily guarantee that one of the first things college freshmen think of when starting school is where the parties are.  If you were to conduct a survey of what students look forward to in college, the greatest percentage would be the wildest parties they want to attend.  They can't help it, its in their DNA to want to have fun.




4. Spring Break-  The only thing better than a canceled class is Spring Break.  This lovely mini vacation allows students to let loose.  Everyone loves a little time off and college students are no different.  You met new friends in college so why not have a great time with them?





5. Roommates-  Some people love the idea of living on campus.  The sense of freedom is enormous.  No more rules from your parents.  Doesn't that sound amazing?! Even though some students don't like their roommates, others grow great friendships during college!  They might even end up looking like these guys.





6.Road Trips-  This is one of my favorites on the list.  There is nothing like jumping in a car with a couple of your buds and taking a trip somewhere! You never know who you might meet on these road trips, but that is the beauty of it.  You might meet a really cool Chinese man that owns his own restaurant in Canada.





7.Bookstore Money-  Every so often you get some funds in your ID car that can be used to buy stuff at the bookstore. That ID card will become your go to source when you are in desperate need of gum.  At the end of the day you'll have to pay that money back but what's a pack of orbit and a red-bull right?








8. 7-Eleven Runs- I don't mean having to run to the bathroom after a corn-dog  I'm referring to that go to spot when you have to "disscuss" life's issues with your friends.  Spots like these make college that much
memorable because they become your getaway place from the thoughts of school.









9.Term papers/Finals-  There is no other way for me to put this other than you're going to get them, more
than you can even imagine. Get ready.









10.Drama- You thought High School was bad?  Oh man are you in for a surprise.  People DO NOT mature as fast as they should so be prepared for rumors, drama, beef, cold stares, and broken friendships.  Don't be discouraged, it is all part of the beauty of college.


Catch you next time,

-L.U.J

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Out of Control Parenting

The "helicopter parenting" phenomenon seems to be getting nuttier by the minute and it's easy to harrumph over the latest anecdote about a mother calling the academic dean of a college to ask why her child got a bad grade. As a college counselor at an "elite" private high school I often had to deal with mommies (seems like it's more often mommies than daddies) who wanted to know how their child could get an A instead of an A- so he or she could get into Brown. Or who basically ran the college process while the children lazed about in blissful torpor. These stories tend to validate our feeling that the current generation of college-aged students has become way too pampered for its own good.

Unfortunately for us, Margaret K. Nelson has written an interesting and level-headed book on the topic called Parenting Out of Control: Anxious Parents in Uncertain Times. Rather than gleefully narrating the various misbehaviors of these over-involved parents, she approaches the topic from a sociological perspective. (Nelson is a professor of sociology at Middlebury College in Vermont.) Using class divisions and technological innovation as prisms, she looks at why parents might behave the way they do and provides some clear, if incomplete, insights about why parents these days do the things they do.

Nelson bases her conclusions on a relatively small sampling of individuals she divides into "working class," middle class," and "professional middle class" parents. As a result, her brush paints a rather broad picture of child-rearing practices in each group. She writes that WC and MC parents "are...less interested in intimacy and engagement [with their children] than they are in clear rules of authority within the family." In contrast, the PMC parents she describes have "a lengthy perspective on children's dependency without a clear launching point for a grown child," and "put child rearing front and center: even in the midst of extremely busy lives, they highlight the significance and meaning they find in this activity, and they avoid shortcuts (such as playpens) that could make the job easier."

But more interesting is how Nelson contrasts the WC/MC and PMC views of their children as individuals in a way that puts most of the helicoptering onus on the PMC parents. Less privileged parents, according to Nelson, "insist that by the end of a comparatively short educational career a child should be ready to pick a career, find a job, and begin the next stage of life as a fully formed adult." They "want to encourage their children to grow...But their role involves acceptance of the particularities of their children and does not rest on a view of unlimited potential, of children who can become 'the best.'" Especially in relation to college, WC/MC parents want their children to do something productive, not play around for four years.

In contrast, PMC parents see their children as ongoing projects with unlimited potential. As a result, there's no end to the work of seeing them develop, which is why they insist on being "present" so constantly. For them, college isn't a "vocational training ground," it is a place for personal self-development: "...in lieu of job preparation, elite parents talk about the important opportunities colleges might provide for self-discovery and for gaining self-confidence. Rather than viewing college as a launching pad to independent adulthood, parents see it as a time for their children to acquire the necessary cultural and social capital to be able to seize any opportunities for status that may arise." No wonder my students' parents wanted them to go to Brown and not Tufts!

If you perceive your children as "out the door" when they turn 18, there's no need to keep a continual eye on them. As a parent, you've done your job and what results is what you've got. PMC parents have created a never-ending process that needs continual tweaking and adjusting. They see their children as extensions of themselves and their parenting, and so must always be involved. College is a place to refine their projects in the never-ending drive toward "perfection," whatever form that may take.

Nelson makes the case that technological devices such as baby monitors, security bracelets, and cell phones have changed the ways parents connect with their children, often making them more fearful, not less, and promoting a sense of needing to be continually in touch with their offspring. She notes, however, that PMC parents are less likely to rely on technology to monitor and control their children than are MC/WC parents because of their commitment to molding their children's "potential" and being intimately involved with every detail of their lives. PMC parents make calls, write emails, and so on as a natural extension of their involvement with their children; MC/WC parents are less likely to do so because they see their children as already on their way to independence.

Parenting Out of Control does a good job of delineating some of the possible sources of helicopter parenting even while it remains frustratingly shallow. It relies too heavily on Nelson's small sample and seems to lean too much on stereotypes of privileged versus non-privileged parenting and family life without offering real three-dimensional analysis. However, using class as a way to talk about families' expectations for their children and college is a fresh way to talk about the subject, and readers attuned to the relationship of college attainment to status consciousness will find Parenting a good source for further discussion and observation.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

High School, College Admission, and Class

The following post is a book review I wrote for the NACAC online book review section. It was published in August, 2008.

Tearing Down the Gates: Confronting the Class Divide in American Education
By Peter Sacks
University of California Press
$24.95, 373 pages (incl. notes and index), hardcover

Reviewed by Willard M. Dix
Executive Director, College Access Counseling

The college admission Petri dish grows many strains of the American Dream. Mixing aspiration, class-consciousness, education, social and cultural expectations, adolescent psychology, family dynamics, and financial complexity, it produces wildly varying results. Until recently, the formula seemed simple: ӀmeritԀ plus financial wherewithal plus extracurricular prowess equaled entr退e into the hallowed halls. But social and cultural awareness over the last 30 years has shown that formula to be more complex than once thought, and its effects more pernicious than the Dream would dictate.

In his new book, Tearing Down the Gates: Confronting the Class Divide in American Education, Peter Sacks looks at issues of class using the high school to college nexus as his laboratory. Combining solid research with portraits of young people and one educator struggling against classրbound issues, he asks us to consider that issues of class, as much as of education, have a significant impact on those striving to better their circumstances in American society.

Crashing the party
Sacks argues that Ӏclass is the grand organizing principle of American educationԀ and as such it works against those not already in the middle- or upper-middle classes. He challenges us to rethink the simplistic assumption that education by itself is a way for non-elites to enter the middle class. Educational Ӏstandards,Ԁ for example, often cater to those already capable of meeting them, rather than encourage othersҀ achievement. As a reverse example, he profiles Oceanside High SchoolҀs Dayle Mazzarella, Ӏa dangerous man,Ԁ who developed a successful program that opened advanced courses to students once considered incapable of succeeding in them. Sacks calls the San Diego teacher someone who is Ӏcrashing the exclusive party that American higher education has becomeԀ because he dares to assume that non-elites can achieve the same success of their more privileged peers if only they are challenged and supported properly.

Public and Private Commitment
Although this portrait and others in the book help bring the theme of class and education into focus, they are not as compelling as SacksҀs look at how higher education seems to be becoming more, rather than less, a bastion for elites and more adept at serving private, rather than public (read societyҀs) interests. He notes that Ӏa mere three percent of the freshmen enrolled at the nationҀs 146 most selective institutions came from the lowest socioeconomic quartileԀ in a 2004 study, while Ӏ almost 75 percentŀcame from the highestŀquartile.Ԁ In another, it was found that ӀoneҀs social background ׀particularly oneҀs fatherҀs education ׀proved to be just as powerful as academic merit in predicting the selectivity of the college one attended,Ԁ and that, in fact, that power has doubled over the years from 1980 to 1992.

At a time when a great deal of college rhetoric focuses on serving more lower-income and first-generation students, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. Sacks quotes a recent study contrasting university endowments with the number of students receiving Pell Grants on campus: Many of those with the healthiest endowments had the fewest Pell recipients: Harvard (6.8 percent), Princeton (7.4), Washington University in St. Louis (8) and Wake Forest (7) being among them. Even more unsettling are the records of state institutions, designed specifically to provide education for the public good. He finds that the University of Michigan, for example, while increasing its overall prestige through greater selectivity and claiming to pay more attention to Ӏsocio-economic diversityԀ actually slashed its Pell Grant enrollment in half between 1992 and 2002. It and other similar institutions seem to be abandoning their commitment to the greater good in favor of chasing institutional prestige, a worrisome development that threatens their social role as developers of the middle class.

At the gates
Sacks believes that we should work harder to make American education the leg up to the middle class we envision it to be. He celebrates the Ӏrabble rousersԀ and Ӏgate crashersԀ already doing that work and in the final chapter makes a few suggestions for action that would bear much more development. Tearing Down the Gates is in fact more polite than radical, spotlighting the intersection of class, privilege, and education and prodding us to a wider consideration of how they ought to work. The battle has not yet been joined, but, as Sacks notes, Ӏfor any educational reform to really happenŀAmerica will have to confront its class problem.Ԁ By putting high school education and college admission in this context, Sacks has significantly moved that discussion forward.