Tuesday, May 26, 2009

MUSIC RESPONSE:

MUSIC RESPONSE:

LITEFOOT- The spoken interludes characteristic of rap music sometimes reveal a more frank portrayal of the blunt views or situations of the artist. In ӀInterlude- The Apple,Ԁ we see that Litefoot has adapted himself to a culture of rapper-style thugs/thug wannabes who speak with hood vocabularies. For example, one man questions the man he dubs рthe appleҀ if he his Ӏplayer hatingԀ on Litefoot for not spreading the wealth. He makes this accusation, and then tells рthe appleҀ he should try to provide for himself, Ӏlike our ancestors used to do,Ԁ- a serious call out and revealing of how important the cultural history still is to contemporary CherokeeҀs. The accuser also gives credit to Litefoot for his service on reservations and therefore helping in the community, demonstrating value.

I will not lie, I can jam to some of LitefootҀs beats. рConcrete SoldierҀ, рVision QuestҀ, and рDedicatedҀ are my main jams. I find рConcrete SoldierҀ particularly gangster as well as telling. The title in itself is metaphorical of the contemporary Cherokee adapting to the changing time and current world of asphalt city-living and new technology. I believe this song contains a Cherokee perception of masculinity seen in the repeated focus upon being a soldier (rolling strapped), having Cherokee goddesses, and certain lyrical mentions of pride and courage such as Ӏquick to earn a stripe, quick to take your life,Ԁ In noting battle strategies such as рcusters last standҀ in the lyrics, as well as mentions of burial places and chieftains, Litefoot shows us the CherokeeҀs proud heritage and culture as well as being knowledgeable about historical events.

OTHER-Much of the contemporary music we have been given to listen to, including Tori AmosҀ рHome on the RangeҀ, the Raiders рIndian ReservationҀ, рReservation BluesҀ, and some others give off the perception of a depressed state of affairs for the Cherokee suffering through the land-stealing, multiple relocations, and present poverty and attempt to rebuild. On the other hand, The Muskogee рWayland GrayҀ and рFarron CulleyҀ are awesome tribal examples of calls and call back and tribal music from the past which are a great look into traditional Native American culture that give a whole new spin on the nation, and help support the notion that the nation is still strong and reviving if this music has been recorded and preserved (therefore balancing out the depressing songs at least somewhat).

Monday, May 25, 2009

Consolidate student loan

Lighten the load of your school loan consolidation or college loan consolidation and consolidate student loan in time so that you feel at ease when you repay your loan.

You may visit hundreds of bodies offering loan consolidation at different rates. But you should be aware of the seriousness of the matter and try to look for the service that is the most reliable.

Consolidate student loan so that you donҀt have to search and calculate for all the companies that have offered you loans. In this manner you may face only your consolidators and then they will prepare the program for your school loan consolidation or college loan consolidation. Thus you will only have to pay to the single body, which is your consolidator and then your consolidators will pay the loan to your lenders in a manner that eases the burden off the debt.

There is no doubt that student loan consolidation programs are to the student or their parentҀs advantage but without the relevant information student loan consolidation programs can become student loan scams.

So make a good decision when opting to Consolidate student loan and pay your school or college loan in an easy manner through your school loan consolidation or college loan consolidation program.

Good luck!

Saturday, May 23, 2009

System of a Downer

Those of us in the admission profession tend to think about what we do fairly narrowly when we talk about issues like testing, essays, financial aid, and other aspects of the college process. We focus on how we perceive them as elements of what we do, how they are related to the Standards of Principles and Good Practice (SPGP) and how they affect our bottom lines, whatever those might be for a high school or a college.

We forget sometimes that the college admission process is not an isolated thing--it is part of a system, or rather several systems. It doesn't exist in a vacuum, and it's not merely a neutral end result of twelve years of education. Among other things, it exists at the choke point between high school and post-secondary education, at a moment the late great MIT admission officer B. Alden Thresher called "the great sorting." When requirements are changed they reverberate through the educational system before it and alter the makeup of student bodies following it; when iconic universities decide to do something, it affects what others do as well.

Ripples from college admission intersect with major themes and threads of American culture. Class and status affect (or distort) how families are able to think about post-secondary opportunities for their children; educational philosophies affect how high schools articulate with colleges; economics determines the relationships that exist among families, colleges, endowments, and so on; the economy itself determines how many graduates the workforce can handle, and so on and on. In this light, the seemingly one-to-one relationship of good acadedmic performance and college admission seems almost comically small, although it takes up most of the reporting about it and should really be the centerpiece of the whole process.

Examples of these interrelations can be seen almost every day: How will "Score Choice" affect how students report their testing to colleges? How do private counselors affect the "integrity" of students applications? Why do people who can afford it feel compelled to use them in the first place? What's at stake? If a high school decides to use a unique grading system, how will that affect its students? When colleges change their admission requirements, how does that affect high schools? If financial aid becomes more restricted, how will families educate their children?

Some of these questions seem trivial, but if you listen to counselors and college people enough you'll see they reverberate as the system tries to adjust to maintain its equilibrium. But outside forces are always impinging on it and we don't always see that. What about those class and status issues? What about the growth of test prep as high schools decide scores are critical to college admission even as more and more colleges go test optional or treat scores with more latitude? Is the divide between low-income and upper-income students being addressed in regard to college access beyond now-traditional "multi-cultural recruitment" programs? Are those enough?

Not enough has been done to consider college admission and what surrounds it in the larger context of American culture. One problem is that it is such a vast and complex phenomenon it's difficult to know where to begin. But more should be done to study it in that context so we can try to create a genuinely equitable system that will motivate, accept, and educate all students to the best of their abilities no matter what their backgrounds. Until we have a comprehensive view of college admission, we will be talking too much to ourselves.

Mankiller response

Mankiller considers her own story as a struggle parallel to the overall struggle of her people. But as she herself points out, this way of relating her story is not different from the ways other native people choose to tell their own life stories, as she relates: "When asked to tell a writer about his life, the great Geronimo reportedly replied, 'First, let me tell you about my people'" (259). Rooted both in past and present, both Mankiller's personal narrative and that of the Cherokee people seek to bring the events and traditions of the past into a modern context. Past is not exclusive of the present just as person is not exclusive of the people. Even more unique about Mankiller's story is that woman is not exclusive from women, as she fully realized that her actions as the first female Chief of the Cherokee Nation would reflect upon the potential for women in leadership positions within the tribal community, and indeed, upon the potential of women in overall society.

In fact, I think the issue of gender is one of the most important aspects about Mankiller's story as it exemplifies one of Mankiller's avowed goals: to emphasize to Cherokees that "we have indigenous solutions to our problems" (251). Where external forces absorbed from broader society have worked to disjoin the Cherokee and other Indian communities, the ways to restore cohesion and new direction lie internally. The effects of removal, relocation, cultural tyranny, racism, and sexism have fractured the Cherokee people, and traditional values provide unique answers to remediating these fragmentary forces. Mankiller's example, in overcoming imported Western stigma about her gender to restore the respected place of women in Cherokee society, proves that point--Cherokees need only to look to their traditions to apply solutions to modern obstacles. Indigenous solutions, such as the inclusive strength of tribal kinship, can overcome prejudices and promote cooperation needed to rejuvenate communities such as Bell.

Though I suppose Mankiller's story is different in the broader context of biographies, and is also uniquely Cherokee, the inclusive power of tribal kinship to pave way for her rise to leadership despite gender and to formulate her identity as a self-assured woman places Mankiller's story in direct connection to the stories of other native people. Her story especially reminded me of the autobiography of Lakota Sioux activist Mary Crow Dog, Lakota Woman. Mankiller briefly mentions Mary and her husband, Leonard Crow Dog, as "a vital cog in the Native American movement" (197). Though Mankiller doesn't relate it directly, both come to realize their potential and strength as women through involvement in Native American activism and through the vital roles other women have played in their lives. The greatest model for Mankiller were the Ghigau, or Beloved Woman, those who had achieved the highest honor a Cherokee woman could achieve, like the Ghigau Nancy Ward (207). These "brave women who followed their husbands and brothers into battle" taught her the strength of will to fight for what she believed in despite the odds (207).

Women all around Mankiller impressed upon her sense of self and expanded her sense of community, clearly evident in all the references she makes to friends and family she admired. First there were her sisters, especially Linda, who shared in the struggle of relocation and trying to fit in at school with "Okie" accents (103), and Vanessa, who shared in her activism at Alcatraz. Her grandmother Sitton took her in and showed her how to make it during her troubled youth in California. Of course her daughters highlight this female communal bond, especially Gina, who continues to take up the activist cause of her mother and whose bond with her mother and sister persisted despite her time away, forced to live with her father. The inclusiveness of kinship tradition unites Mankiller with other women in common activist goals and intertribal connection. There are people like Annie Oakes, a Pomo woman and wife of activist Richard Oakes, whose story she remembers in the faces of other Cherokees, not just as a Pomo (195). She details the solid friendship of women formed at meetings in the kitchen of her friend Lou Trudell, wife of Sioux activist John Trudell, and the inspiration she drew from Gustine Moppin, Klamath, Susie Steel Regimbal, Pomo, and Linda Aaronyado, Creek & Filipina, friendships which continue to resound with her despite time and the loss of life.

The inclusiveness of kinship also crosses racial divides, combating prejudice there as in gender, as Mankiller forms bonds with black, latina, and white women laboring against racial and economic struggles. Some of her first inspiration for community organizing came from the urban activity of Black Panthers, and because of their similar struggles, Mankiller relates that "[e]ven today, more than thirty years later, the sisterly company of black women is especially enjoyable to me" (108). Some of these women outside her tribe and race became as family to her, as with Rose and Judy Bastidas, her sisters in law with whom she "shared the births of our children, our twenty-first birthdays, and the transition from youth to womanhood" (149). Sherry Morris, though a white Southerner with "very few similarities" to herself, immediately became close to Mankiller because of their shared passion about improving rural health care; the car crash they suffered in a tragic coincedence, in which Sherry perished, forever tied Mankiller spiritually to her friend (220).

Mankiller's strength of narrative comes from the essential element of Cherokee people to adapt their inclusive kinship traditions to modern experiences. Her role as a woman exemplifies this ability to revive older traditions in modern contexts for new results. It also shows how the tribe can expand and survive beyond terms of full blood and mixed blood; as in her own mixed family, the sense of tribal inclusion goes beyond gender or race and should instead be about the strength of unified community to get things done and determine its own course.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Response to Mankiller

***Tol, hopefully this is alright, but I sort of borrowed a concept from Walker's response and added my own thoughts to the idea. I figured since blogging is a kind of discussion forum anyways that you wouldn't mind, but if you do just let me know.***

Wilma MankillerҀs autobiography was definitely different than any kind of biography I have ever read. The way she incorporated Cherokee history into her own personal story really enriched the reading for me. This past year I took an introductory course in Native American history, so a lot of the history she recounted in the book was familiar to me already. I have never been particularly interested in just reading history, but the way Mankiller emphasized the struggles of the Cherokee people through her own trials managed to keep me captivated in the book.

As a Psychology major, when learning about the past of a particular people I like to get a social view into their lives. In WalkerҀs response he brings up the idea of MankillerҀs book showing readers the рremembered historyҀ of the Cherokees; I found this to be a very astute observation because for me it pinpointed exactly what makes the book interesting. I find oral history to be a much more personal look into a culture than just what you will find written in a regular history book, so I think the stories were an important addition for the feel Mankiller tried to give her autobiography. A facet of her book that I thought emphasized this idea of a рremembered historyҀ was the traditional Cherokee stories provided at the beginning of each chapter. The creation story told at the beginning of the second chapter particularly caught my interest because I have actually heard it before in my Native American History course. My class watched an animated short of this story being told in the Cherokee language (with English subtitles). Reading this story again in MankillerҀs book reminded me of the things IҀll be able to experience from this trip. I find oral history to be a much more personal look into a culture than just what you will find written in a history book, so I think the stories were an important addition to the book.

I cannot say the book has actually caused any questions to arise for me; rather it has just inspired a general enthusiasm for learning more about the Cherokee people first-hand. I canҀt wait to get to Oklahoma and see for myself how these people incorporate their past into present times.

Mankiller Response

MankillerҀs autobiography is different in that it encompasses the history of the Cherokee people. This demonstrates the selflessness seen throughout Native cultures, where greater emphasis is placed on community and kinship rather than the individual. An individualҀs responsibility is to oneҀs family and tribe above self. Mankiller tells the story of the Cherokee people in addition to her own. The way the story has come together, it seems she had to write about one in order to be able to write about the other.

Mankiller notes that Cherokees have been able to lead successful lives Ӏin a very modern, fast-paced world, while preserving [their] cultural values and traditionsԀ (254). The Cherokee Nation has always been noted for being able to adapt to the non-Indian world forced upon it. Mankiller says that Cherokees Ӏlive within two realitiesŀthe acceptance of and ability to deal with the non-Indian world around us, and the otherŀbeing able to hold onto and retain our ancient Cherokee belief systems, values, customs, and ritualsԀ (220). In this way, the contemporary Cherokee Nation maintains its connection with the Cherokee tribe that preceded it. The wishes of Jefferson, Jackson, et al for the Native American to be totally absorbed into white culture have failed to be fulfilled among the Cherokee Nation. Perhaps this can be attributed to those who adopted Ӏa Cherokee approach to life.Ԁ The elders say it is Ӏbeing of good mind,Ԁ meaning removing negative thoughts, thinking positively, and taking what is given out and changing it into a better path (226). Thinking about an individual, such as Mankiller herself, taking this approach to life is empowering. History shows the power in numbers of the many who have taken the Cherokee approach to life. That the Cherokee Nation has endured so much suggests that the people are able to continue and go even further. Each Cherokee, like Mankiller, can Ӏfind the way to be of good mindԀ (229).

Mankiller writes that she wants to be remembered Ӏfor emphasizing the fact that we have indigenous solutions to our problems. Cherokee values, especially those of helping one another and of our interconnections with the land, can be used to address contemporary issuesԀ (251). What, more specifically, are some of those issues and how can they be solved? I am hoping to become more aware of some of the current issues in the coming weeks during our study.

Mankiller Response

Wilma MankillerҀs autobiography is unusual in the way that it incorporates not only her personal story but the story of her people. The autobiography took on more of the format of an historical narrative than that of a typical autobiography. There is a great deal of history given about the Cherokee tribe, which often gets tangled up in anecdotes from MankillerҀs life. For example, Mankiller in the very first pages discusses her namesҀ meaning and the importance of names in Cherokee culture. She begins by talking about Native Americans names Ӏnot as mere labels, but as essential parts of their personalities.Ԁ She then continues by explaining the lineage of her name and her ancestors.

The Cherokees have and maintain a close connection with their ancestors, and Mankiller illustrates these connections throughout her autobiography. As Mankiller explains on page 14 of her autobiography, Ӏ[her] own story has meaning only as long as it is a part of the overall store of my people. For above all else [she is] a Cherokee woman.Ԁ Mankiller begins very quickly to connect her story closely to her peopleҀs history. While discussing her tribeҀs history, she explains how certain events affected her family or her ancestors. Many autobiographies pay little attention to overall history. Chief Mankiller places a great deal of emphasis on her ancient history, something rarely seen in contemporary autobiographies. If I, for instance were to write an autobiography, I would spend probably a paragraph discussing my family lineage because it plays a small role in my day to day life. Chief Mankiller, however, discusses the trials and perils of the Cherokee nation for pages, and even chapters. This is a great example though of how differently our emphasis of history is than that of the Cherokee people, or any native tribe for that matter. History is so important to the Cherokees, because without their history, they cannot begin to prepare for the future. They live their history everyday because they must stay so connected to their beliefs, traditions, and cultures of their ancestors.

One of my favorite things about MankillerҀs autobiography is the references and quotations of other natives, or people who have some kind of connection to the Cherokee Nation. I especially like the references by Victore Vine Deloria, brother of well known Lakota Sioux Ella Deloria. The connections of the Sioux and the Cherokee have varied in the past, but it is interesting to me that the concerns and customs of one tribe can sometimes be mirrored in another.

Chief Mankiller does, I think, an excellent job of dispelling rumors and stereotypes about the history of the Cherokee Nation. Most Americans, as Mankiller attests, know very little about the history of the Cherokee people. Or, if they do know, they know it from what can best be described as a white perspective; they know Native American history through the eyes and thoughts of the United States government, or those who write the history books. Many stories of native history, like removal, are told often with very biased opinions. Chief Mankiller attempts to tell the stories from the other side, a side rarely seen.

The Cherokee Nation of today and the Cherokee Nation of the past share many similarities and many differences. However, it is not their similarities and differences that should be focused on, it is their connections. Such connections make the current Cherokee Nation what it is. The United States is a society that has ties to its past, and pride in its history, but not nearly on the scale that the Cherokee Nation does. They not only take pride in it, but they take strides to connect with it as much as possible. Mankiller illustrates this when she discusses the sesquicentennial of the Cherokee Removal in 1989, and the coming together of the Eastern Band and Oklahoma Band of Cherokee tribes. The former was a solemn, yet necessary event that helped to understand and connect more with the tribeҀs history, even if it was a tragic history. The reunion of the two bands of the tribe was another way for them all to connect with their past. The connection that Cherokees share with their past is what makes them Cherokee. It is what makes any group who they are, but some groups like Americans, lose that connection as the years pass, and Cherokees do not.

One question I had was the question of religion. How do Cherokees compromise their view on the Creation with their views on Christianity? It was mentioned that many Cherokee are Baptist, IҀm sure that others are other denominations as well, but how do they wrestle their Creation story with that of the Christian Creation story?